Finn Murgett vs Jonathan Binding Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Murgett vs Binding analysis and find out who is favored!
Finn Murgett vs Jonathan Binding Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Murgett 1 - 0 Binding
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Murgett has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Binding has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Murgett, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Binding has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Murgett has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Binding has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Murgett has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 17/ 10), with Binding winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Murgett has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Murgett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10), where as Binding has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Murgett winning 1 times and Binding being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Murgett winning 2 and Binding winning 0. The last match between Murgett and Binding was at the M25 Roehampton, 11-07-2022, Q3, Grass with Finn Murgett getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Murgett and Binding have played a deciding set 0 times, with Murgett winning 0 times and Binding 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Murgett winning 0, and Binding 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Murgett has played against opponents with an average rank of 50.7 while Binding has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Murgett has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Binding has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Murgett has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Binding has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (24-20)
Career Total W/L
53% (85-75)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Finn Murgett vs Jonathan Binding For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Murgett VS Binding
stats | Finn Murgett | Jonathan Binding |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
DFs Total | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (29/53) | 70% (32/46) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 59% (19/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 43% (6/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Points W% | 46% (21/46) | 32% (17/53) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Finn Murgett | Jonathan Binding |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Finn Murgett Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Adam Neff
Player
Finn Murgett
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Finn Murgett
Player
Brandon Carpico
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Finn Murgett
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Finn Murgett
Player
Rostislav Galfinger
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(0) 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H |
view more
Murgett Vs Binding Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Murgett are available here and Binding photos here.